I voted NDP the last election, but I must say I almost didn't precisely because I found Layton's unrelenting Liberal bashing annoying. The debates were a ridiculous display of political opportunism at the expense of a discussion of ideas. No matter the question, Layton would turn to Martin and hurl some accusation or criticism, instead of more time spent on his ideas. With the hopes of Liberal renewal, I will probably gravitate back to the Liberals and re-join the party, but that decision will be made much easier if Layton continues with this pre-occupation, that essentially helps the Conservatives.
Harper's political motives are obvious, almost all his comments are meant to appeal to a pre-determined audience. With Layton, the hyper-politicism is especially disappointing because it detracts from the legitimate policies. When Layton speaks to issues like the environment or childcare he offers Canadians his vision in a positive manner. When he berates the Liberals, Layton looks the opportunist that is merely interested in siphoning off votes. I understand the calculus, but I doubt the NDP will get results with their current strategy, and as a consequence he plays into Harper's hands. Layton may see his Liberal bashing strategy as a matter of political survival and for that reason it is unrealistic to hope he would stop. However, the real question is one of degree and too often Layton comes off more interested in dumping on the Liberals than he does arguing why people should vote NDP.
4 comments:
I hate to admit it, but this constant NDP attack on the Liberals is probably their best decision in a while. I know that, as a Liberal, I hate it.
Layton knows the mistakes made by Ed Broadbent. Broadbent dominated when the Liberals were weak and spent his time in opposition criticizing the Cons. Then the Liberals reemerged and crushed them down to nothing. If they want to bring up a legitimate party they have to crush the Liberals while they are weak and try to build legitimate longterm support from old Liberals. It worked a bit in the last election, but if the Liberals grow strong again, the NDP will be wiped out...
jason
I agree it is an effective strategy. However, coupled with Layton's claim to the moral high ground, he does run the risk of looking hypocritical by politicizing every decision. I don't think his transparent Liberal bashing really plays well, as evidenced by his debate performances. Certainly, the NDP picked up support, but much of that was in the form of a protest vote, as opposed to a purely positive decision- maybe my vote included.
paul
No question Layton has determined that the Liberals are down and he can fill the vacuum.
It's just Survivor Island on Capitol Hill. Backfiring may be putting it midly.
Post a Comment