If the Conservatives are looking for an opening to unleash a barrage against Ignatieff and the Liberals this may be it as their actions would appear to be defensive rather than offensive.
Oh, good luck with that rationale. Remember all this talk about putting the economy first and seeking bipartisanship? Well, it's off now, because some anonymous person on the internet made a few videos, some bloggers linked, and that represents a breach of the non-aggression pact, so here comes the shit storm of negativity. Never mind, that our pathetic minions have been wasting time in Parliament to slam the Liberals for weeks, so bad they had their knuckles smacked by the Speaker, this is game on. Please. Gosh, I sure hope the Conservatives are dumb enough to take Taylor's advice.
Just the mere mention of Conservative attack ads brought a flurry of editorials chastising the timing, reaffirming all the unproductive narratives that now plague the Conservatives. If anyone is stupid enough to think the YouTube assault absolves any blow back, my goodness, get some fresh air. That said, you know these people are itching, negativity is what they do best, and there is a sense that the Liberals have the ball. It really won't take much to tilt the balance, lessen the sense of hesitation and pounce.
I have to admit, I hope the Conservatives miss the plot here and unleash their barrage. This isn't 2006, and this isn't Dion, it's nothing of the sort. This is post cluster fuck 2008, wherein Harper blew any remaining political capital to justify his hyper-partisan ways. Haven't you noticed, that even a hint of "old" Harper now brings a wide ranging rehash of all the things we've never liked, and all the reasons why the Conservatives haven't reached their primary goal? Throw in the economy, the very serious circumstance, and going negative for the Conservatives is problematic at best. We WILL pounce on THEIR tactics, and quirky references to some obscure "gritgirl" won't quite cut it, on the "they started it" front.
Here's a plausible theoretical. The Conservatives respond to the "insurgent" attack on YouTube as Taylor refers, and release an ad, detailing what a pseudo-Canadian Ignatieff is, alerting the masses to the elitist which lurks. The ads come out to much fanfare, as everyone digests the shock and awe that is the Conservative machine. What, pray tell, will the Liberals do? It just so happens, that like everyday, a new measure or forecast is released, a fresh piece of data, that confirms the historical mess that is unravelling. Armed with reality, it's pretty easy to see the Liberal response, that accomplishes a great deal. Every time bad news is released, you contrast that real fear in Canadians with the Conservatives wasting time scoring political points. I can literally HEAR Ignatieff now, as he easily pivots and SHOVES the attack right back in their faces. Probably more important, how many pesky scribes will see the disconnect and point out the issue of priorities? How many more reminders of past behavior, rearing it's UGLY head again? You know, there's a reason why the ads haven't come to date, and it's because a few Conservative strategists do have their wits about them. Should a few YouTube videos push people to discard their rational deduction, in the end, I say it will all turn out to be a BOOMERANG.
I would say it seems pretty obvious the videos are professionally done. If it is Kinsella then I say good on him. That just proves he is smarter than they are.
As for any attempt to attack Iggy because he was a professor in the US - well best of luck to them. Their biggest attack point also happens to be one of Iggy's biggest assets.
Don't vote for this guy. He is so smart that he taught in one of the most prestigious universities in the world. Who wants someone like that to lead the country when we can have a failed economist who has never had a real job lead the country instead.
If they do go ahead the timing of the Conservative ads would be perfect. Just as the Conservatives attacking Ignatieff for having the gaul to take a teaching post at Harvard, their minister of Science demonstrates that he does not know the first thing about Darwinian theory.
This whole argument about Ignatieff being out of Canada....hmmm. Now, just the other day John Roberts of CNN receives an award (been out of Canada for quite some time) and then, of course, Grezky - he's been out of Canada for years.
So, where's the line about who's Canadian enough?
GritGirl's ads don't demean, don't use stupid cartoons and photos - it's just the facts. Do the CONS have problems with actual facts?
Good thing, they didn't go negative today.
Stephen Taylor is an agent of malice, and his attempt to use Youtube in the last election via an audio clip removed from a portion of a TVO show to defame Elizabeth May failed.
He's a thug waiting for the chance to get back to his natural thuggery.
I don't care who starts it. The fact is that the Grits have found the perfect wedge issue to box Harper with the so-cons, he will have no choice to rely on to win the next election.
If Iggy is game for Stephen Taylor than Stockwell Day will be target no. 1. Should Canada's representative to international economic forums be a creationist? Get your dinosaurs as this will be the major issue in the next election campaign.
The good news keeps pouring in:
Canadian economy battered in January
Merrill Lynch economist David Wolf predicted the first quarter will see the national economy shrink 9.1 per cent, the worst such contraction on record. He also forecast total growth this year to contract three per cent.
Time to launch those ads?
They've been outdone and they are very upset by it.
"The truth hurts."(Old prairie expression.)
You might want to make that ST link point to the actual article, rather than just to Taylor's blog.
Thanks CC :)
Post a Comment